<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Learning |</title><link>https://lelain.net/tags/deep-learning/</link><atom:link href="https://lelain.net/tags/deep-learning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Deep Learning</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Foundation Models in Astronomy: Why They Matter</title><link>https://lelain.net/blog/foundation-models-astronomy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://lelain.net/blog/foundation-models-astronomy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Foundation models — large neural networks pre-trained on massive datasets — are starting to transform astronomical data analysis. Models like DINOv2 or CLIP, originally trained on natural images, can be fine-tuned for astronomical tasks with surprisingly good results. At
, I presented early comparisons of these models on galaxy morphological classification, and my
paper digs into how to best specialize DINOv2 for astronomy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key challenge is the domain gap: astronomical images (multi-band, high dynamic range, specific noise) look nothing like everyday photos. Choosing the right fine-tuning strategy turns out to matter a lot — and is the core focus of my current work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the multimodal side, I am involved in the
collaboration, where I contribute to
— a vision-language model for astronomy presented at ICLR 2025.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Galaxy Morphological Classification with Deep Learning</title><link>https://lelain.net/blog/galaxy-classification/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://lelain.net/blog/galaxy-classification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Galaxy morphological classification — spiral, elliptical, irregular? — is one of the most natural applications of computer vision in astronomy. Datasets like
and
provide crowd-sourced morphological labels for thousands of galaxies and serve as standard benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my work with Sébastien Lefèvre, we compared several pre-trained foundation models (ViT, SwinV2, BEiT, DINOv2) on Galaxy10 DECaLS to see how well they transfer to astronomical images. The short answer: surprisingly well, but the fine-tuning strategy matters a lot. These results were presented at
and
, with a detailed analysis in the
.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>